4 Comments

Excellent prescription for systemic change/improvement! ๐Ÿ‘ Due to a range of political, professional and economic restraints, little of what you Rx will be implemented. Sad.

Expand full comment

The Italian paper referenced here does simulations to show that because luck is more important than talent, evening out research funding (spreading the money around, as the Canadians do) would yield more discoveries.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-role-of-luck-in-life-success-is-far-greater-than-we-realized/

Expand full comment

While I agree completely with all the points made here, your arguments could have been even stronger by including the Department of Energy Office of Science. DOE OS has a similar budget to NSF and funds 70% of physical science research in the US, but it is unfortunately almost always left out of national conversations about federal science funding. Here are a few points of synergy:

* DOE OS also suffers from the issues of peer-reviewed grants and soft money

* DOE OS programs are managed by pairs of permanent staff and 2-year "detailees" from academia (similar to NSF's "rotators")

Expand full comment